“It was a pleasure to burn.” Guy Montag, from Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451
Matthew LeHew Calls Out Ergun Caner
Matthew LeHew
“It’s simply important for all BPC stakeholders, especially the faculty and staff that make their living at the institution, to realize how serious the situation is”[1] – Matthew LeHew
On or about the 10th of July, Matthew LeHew published an article on his personal website entitled “Ergun Caner is Wrong About Brewton-Parker’s Accreditation”. LeHew was responding to a video (see below) in which Caner assesses the ramifications of the recent decision of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) to strip Brewton-Parker College of its accreditation (Caner is the President of that school). In the video, Caner makes a number of claims with which LeHew takes exception, most notably the claim that “(Brewton Parker) won’t lose (its) accreditation, not for a moment.” At first blush, someone posting yet another criticism of Ergun Caner doesn’t seem like big news; I’ve done it, Mark Lamprecht has done it, James White has done it, JD Hall has done it, Tom Rich has done it, others have done it; Caner and Brewton-Parker are criticized weekly, if not daily, by many. So what’s new? What is significant about Matthew LeHew writing an article critical of Caner? Matthew LeHew’s criticism is very significant because of where he works and what he does for a living. Lehew is an “Assistant Accreditation Liaison” at Shorter University, which, like Brewton-Parker, is a Georgia Baptist Institution. According to Shorter’s website, LeHew worked as “as an accreditation compliance officer at The Baptist College of Florida” before coming to Shorter. So, not only is Matthew LeHew the first (to my knowledge) employee of a Georgia Baptist cause to publicly criticize Ergun Caner and Brewton-Parker, he is a Georgia Baptist insider with expertise in matters of institutional accreditation. LeHew’s article was, to say the least, very damning of Ergun Caner’s claims. The article was also very well written. Such quality is to be expected from LeHew, who is also an “Instructor of Communication Arts” at Shorter University and teaches a class entitled “Media Law & Ethics.” To summarize: A Georgia Baptist college communications instructor who works in the area of institutional accreditation and teaches a class called “Media Law and Ethics” wrote and published an article for the whole world wide web to see in which he stated: “Ergun Caner, president of BPC, has (deliberately or not) misrepresented the security of his institution’s accredited status to his faculty and staff.”[2] LeHew is not an accountant (like me), a financial services professional (like Lamprecht), an apologist (like White), or an electrical engineer (like Rich); he is a communications professional employed by a Georgia Baptist Institution that works in the area of institutional accreditation and has proclaimed Ergun Caner’s statements about Brewton Parker’s accreditation status to be “egregious”[3] and “very, very wrong.”[4] I don’t know how many page views LeHew’s website received after he posted his article, but I do know he website stopped working for a time, perhaps because it was overwhelmed by server traffic. Now, his article is gone. It was removed almost as quickly as it was posted. The critical article has been replaced…by an apology. Not only has the article been removed but LeHew has demanded that Tom Rich remove a copy of it from his blog. Rich, with LeHew’s persmission, had posted a copy of LeHew’s article during the time in which LeHew’s website was down. Now, LeHew has demanded that Rich remove the copy. Rich has done so. I am left thinking that LeHew removed the article and posted an apology because his job at Shorter University was threatened. LeHew’s critical article, it appears, has been censored. Did the powers that be at Shorter and the Georgia Baptist Convention consider it dangerous? Having read LeHew’s article and observed the candor with which LeHew wrote, I’m convinced that they did. If Mathew LeHew was under the impression that he possessed a certain degree of academic or personal freedom while in the employ of Shorter University, it appears as if that impression was a mistaken one. As LeHew took down his article and issued (what I believe to be) a contrived apology, I wonder, did he think his words were a pleasure to burn? Did LeHew take stock of his situation and come to the realization that he worked for the thought police? To those familiar with recent events at Shorter, a situation like LeHew’s should not come as a surprise. Shorter University is no stranger to controversy. It recently had accreditation and faculty problems of its own but it seems to have come through them. Shorter has been target of criticism from those outside of the Georgia Baptist Convention for some time and, now, one of its own, Matthew LeHew, seems to have caused, from within, a stir.
LeHew’s Assessment
“Caner not only downplays the seriousness of the situation, but goes so far as to make a pivotal false statement regarding the outcome of BPC’s upcoming appeal.”[5] Matthew LeHew
In his criticism of Caner’s statements, Matthew LeHew did not even make a specific assessment about the charlatanry of which Caner has been accused. Rather he focused solely on Caner’s claims about Brewton-Parker’s accreditation. LeHew addressed the following claims made by Ergun Caner:
(1) The claim that Brewton Parker remains accredited and will continue to be accredited.
In response to this claim, LeHew noted that while technically true, it is also “disingenuous”[6]. LeHew observed that, since SACS has already voted to remove Brewton-Parker from membership, its “continued accreditation is a mere technicality pending an appeal in August (2014).”[7] LeHew claimed that the truth is as follows: “(Brewton Parker’s) accrediting agency has voted to kick (it) out, but (it’s) got an appeal coming up that is literally (it’s) last chance.” LeHew pointed out that Brewton-Parker, despite its loss of membership, continues to assure (students’) parents that situation is fine.
(2) The claim that removal of Brewton-Parker’s accreditation is a long process.
In response to this claim, LeHew pointed out that while accreditation removal is a long process, Brewton-Parker is at the end of it. The hearing in August is the final part. LeHew, showing his expertise on accreditation, pointed out that SACS Principles of Accreditation “forbid an institution from being on Probation for over two years, even with good cause.”[8]
(3) The claim that Brewton Parker will maintain its accreditation even if the appeals process does not go well.
In response to this claim, LeHew remarked, “…that portion of the video (where Caner makes the claim above)…must be seen to be believed. I confess I’ve never seen Caner in person, nor have I heard him speak in public. I don’t know if what I’m interpreting in the video as supreme levels of condescension and smugness are misattributed aspects of his regular speaking tone.”[9] LeHew made it clear that if the appeals process does not go well, Brewton-Parker will have no more opportunities. Interestingly enough, this is the very same claim that Caner himself made in an interview with Gerald Harris of the Christian Index in March of 2014. When asked by Harris about the SACS accreditation review, Caner stated, “…this is the year we are going to hit it out of the park or strike out.” Now, upon learning that his college has swung and missed at strike three, Caner is claiming that there are more innings yet to play! Once again, Caner has been caught making “factual statements that are self-contradictory.” The ever-enabled Caner, it seems, just can’t help himself.
(4) The claim that every Brewton-Parker degree transfers
In response to this claim, LeHew noted that, if accreditation is lost, credits earned at the school will not be guaranteed transferable and undergraduate degrees granted by the school cannot be guaranteed to count towards graduate school.
(5) The claims that Brewton-Parker has “all the financial resources, including federal aid.”
In response to this claim, LeHew noted that, if accreditation is lost, students will lose the ability to receive federal financial aid through Title IV.
(6) The claim that Brewton-Parker will not lose its accreditation for a moment.
In response to this claim, LeHew pointed out that even if Brewton-Parker files and injunction to delay its loss of accreditation, it will be unaccredited during the time before the injunction is filed. Of course, if the injunction fails, it will certainly lose accreditation.
(7) The claim that Brewton Parker is in the black and has a balanced budget for next year.
In response to this claim, LeHew stated, “(Caner) said that (Brewton-Parker College) isn’t in deficit, but doesn’t mention debt. Caner’s justification of BPC’s financial situation is actually very restricted, and his response doesn’t actually indicate compliance with the Principles of Accreditation at all…And if Caner refuses to change anything leading up to the August appeal, then it’s a virtual guarantee that it will be denied, and there’s little reason for a judge to issue any kind of preliminary injunction.”[10] As an accountant, I can appreciate LeHew’s appeal to hard numbers here. LeHew observed that Brewton-Parker’s liabilities were a little over 50% of the size of their assets. In accounting parlance, this is called a going concern problem. When an organization’s financial statements indicate a doubt in its ability to continue, it’s usually a sign of impending doom.
“…I know I’m an idiot.” Ergun Caner
To conclude his criticism of Caner, LeHew stated: “A selfie video from the president doesn’t change the fact that an adverse decision will result in the devaluation of all active students’ degrees, as well as their inability to pay for their education. Private colleges without any other institutional accreditation don’t simply ‘bounce back’ from those circumstances.”[11]LeHew also offered a seemingly token statement encouraging Christians to pray for Brewton-Parker and its faculty, staff, and students. However, he also calls upon his readers to “…remember that (SACS) isn’t an enemy or a persecutor. The institution isn’t facing an external adversarial organization, and there should be no rallying cry for Christians to ‘stand’ against such. Rather, the institution is coming to terms with the consequences of its own internal decisions…” Unfortunately, for LeHew, he is coming to terms with the consequences his own internal decision to post a criticism of a Georgia Baptist Institution. His job may now be in jeopardy, while the future and security of men like former Brewton-Parker President Mike Simoneaux and Georgia Baptist Convention President and Former Brewton-Parker Trustee Don Hattaway, who have managed Brewton-Parker into the ground, seem quite secure. Unfortunately, Shorter University itself, also managed (to a degree) by Hattaway is no stranger to the consequences of its own internal decisions.
Shorter College and the Georgia Baptist Life Style
“I want to take personal offense to Caner’s insinuation when he said ‘School after school after school has had to deal with this, including our Baptist brothers and sisters, even those here in Georgia.’ No GBC school has faced a revocation to its accreditation. If he’s alluding to Shorter being placed on Warning in 2013 (and removed in 2014), then it betrays his thorough lack of understanding of the accreditation process. Shorter did NOT go through what BPC is going through.”[12] Matthew LeHew
Just a short drive to Rome on Highway 411 from my home in Cartersville, Georgia is Shorter University. Shorter is a Georgia Baptist institution that boasted a Fall 2013 enrollment of 2,636; it offers both undergraduate and graduate degrees in a variety of disciplines. The University, established in 1873, is a familiar site to anyone traveling along Shorter Avenue. “A twisting driveway leads up from a busy street, past a gatehouse to the Georgian quad where twin gates stand. The gates are emblazoned with mottoes: ‘ENTER TO LEARN’ faces outward; ‘GO FORTH TO SERVE’ faces inward.” In 2002, the college was the scene of a battle for institutional control. Shorter’s erstwhile board of trustees voted to sever the University’s ties with the Georgia Baptist Convention. A legal contest ensued. In 2005, through a decision of the Georgia Supreme Court, Georgia Baptist Convention control was solidified. The board of trustees was soon to be filled with supporters of Georgia Baptist Convention control. In Late 2011, Shorter issued a four-point “lifestyle statement” that all faculty and staff are required to sign if they wished to remain employed. It reads: 
The issuance of the statement resulted in vociferous protests from many liberals and academics. As a Georgia Baptist, I supported the statement…and still do. The fact is there were some professors teaching material in a way that contradicted a biblical worldview. Furthermore, former Chairman of the Shorter Board of Trustees, Nelson Price, lamented that Shorter had a reputation as “a hotbed of homosexuality since the late 1970s.” Such activity and such a reputation have no place in a Christian college…period…end of discussion. As it became apparent that the lifestyle statement would not be scrapped, faculty and staff left in droves. I kept a careful watch of the activity, reading the comments of dissenters and even watching an on-line video of protesters outside the college. I carefully took notice of the names of protesters and dissenters. I Googled them and searched for them on Facebook. My purpose in doing so was to contact them and witness to them. That’s one of the things I love about the digital age. Information and people are closer than ever before. Here in the Bible belt white (and black) southerners all look like Christians. Public statements against biblical standards help flush out lost people better than a traveling evangelist who tells congregants to bow their heads and raise their hands if they aren’t sure about eternity. I tried to strike up a conversation on Facebook with one of the alumni protestors, Brentz Turner, to no avail. I tried to contact Cory Lowe, another protestor, through his website, also to no avail. I emailed [name redacted at her request], another dissenting shorter alumnus. [name redacted at her request] did respond to my attempts at communication. After telling [name redacted at her request], that the lifestyle statement seemed fair given that Shorter was run by Southern Baptists, she responded:
“Southern Baptists are not running Shorter. Fundamentalists are”
The Southern Baptist Confession of Faith is a fundamentalist confession. I’m fundamentalist. Critics like [name redacted at her request] found little sympathy with me. Sadly, I believe [name redacted at her request] and many others who would protest such a lifestyle statement to be lost. I was satisfied with the stand that Shorter and Georgia Baptist Convention were taking. At the time, I was a member of Tabernacle Baptist Church. Three members of that church were on the Shorter Board of Trustees. One of those members was my Pastor, Dr. Don Hattaway, who is now the President of the Georgia Baptist Convention. In addition to serving on the board at Shorter, Hattaway was formerly the chairman of the Board of Trustees at Brewton-Parker College, his alma mater. At the time, I was unaware of the troubles at Brewton-Parker. I did not know that my own pastor was involved in running what I’ve come to think of as an inept and corrupt institution (Brewton-Parker). I’m thankful that the Georgia Baptist Convention took a biblical stand with regards to the situation at Shorter; however, there is no excuse for its failure to uphold its own standard of righteousness. The Georgia Baptist Convention held the liberals employed at Shorter accountable but it hasn’t done so with Ergun Caner and Brewton-Parker College. If you’re thinking that Georgia Baptist Convention Leadership is going do the right thing where Brewton-Parker and Ergun Caner are concerned, you might want to think again.
Ergun Caner with Don Hattaway at Brewton-Parker in 2014
Financial Instability or Religious Persecution?
“Pride goes before destruction, And a haughty spirit before stumbling.” Proverbs 16:18
Rather than taking accountability for and coming to terms with the consequences of Brewton Parker’s internal decisions, Brewton-Parker trustee Bucky Kennedy went on the TV news claiming that SACS is persecuting Brewton-Parker because it is “small, rural, and faith based.” In the light of the real religious persecution that has recently been perpetrated upon Hobby Lobby, Conestoga Wood, and Jake Phillips, Kennedy’s straw man appeal to religious persecution is especially despicable. Rather than take responsibility for the inept management of men like himself, Hattaway, Ergun Caner, and Mike Simoneaux, Kennedy is trying to gin up anti-intellectual sentiment against SACS amongst the South Georgia country folk. This is, very plainly, bad form. Either Kennedy is a buffoon or he is a deceiver. In either case, he’s proved himself unqualified to run an institution of higher learning. This raises the question of the general competence of professional pastors to lead colleges in the state of Georgia. Exactly what are their qualifications? Shorter was recently put on warning with SACS. Truett-McConnell College, a Georgia Baptist institution run by Ergun Caner’s brother Emir, was recently labeled a “dropout factory” with a 14% graduation rate by Time Magazine. Brewton-Parker has been removed from SACS membership for “failing to exercise appropriate control over all its financial resources.” Think about it, the federal government is going to stop giving financial aid to students to attend Brewton-Parker. The federal government…thinks funding Brewton-Parker…is wasteful. Yet, hundreds of Georgia Baptist Churches continue to fund it every week through the cooperative program. Those same churches pay the salaries of the pastors who have taken it upon themselves to become educational administrators. Let’s recall what got Brewton-Parker into its financial mess in the first place (the one it has tried to solve by hiring the charlatan Ergun Caner). It wasn’t religious persecution. As I’ve discussed elsewhere, it was a financial scandal (involving the misuse of federal student financial aid) and its immoral treatment of the whistle-blower, Martha Faw, who called the scandal to light. Brewton-Parker paid $4 million to settle a lawsuit related to that financial scandal. It was a penalty from which they seem unable to recover.
Brewton-Parker Appeals to Mammon
“No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth.”Matthew 6:24
Rather than just admitting failure, cutting its losses, and advising students and faculty to seek educational fulfillment elsewhere (like Shorter or one of the other hundred or so college in Georgia), Brewton-Parker has announced “Stand with Brewton Parker Day.” Brewton-Parker has released a statement (likely worded by VP of Communications Peter Lumpkins) reading, “Brewton-Parker College (BPC) has been an icon of southeast Georgia for well over a century. Few people living in the region remain unaffected by this Georgia Baptist institution. Tens of thousands of college graduates have literally served all over the globe as pastors, missionaries, church-planters, teachers, scholars, business owners, farmers, lawyers, you name it. Our past is glorious because our God is glorious. Our future will be no less glorious because our God is no less glorious!” Apparently such a statement isn’t enough; it’s website lists three reasons why people should stand with Brewton-Parker:
(1) We make no apologies to anyone for being a Christian college founded on a Christian worldview.
It also makes no apologies for the gross incompetence of its leadership and its complete and total lack of accountability. This statement is clearly intended to stir the pot with regards to perceived religious persecution. Stop and think about this for a minute. I’m as Baptist as they come. I’m writing a polemic against Brewton-Parker. In fact, most polemics I come across about Brewton-Parker and Ergun Caner are from Christians who demand the Georgia Baptist Convention clean up its act.
(2) Brewton-Parker College remains an economic mainstay of the Mount Vernon region. Every business and livelihood in the area would be negatively affected with many failing were Brewton-Parker College to fail.
Wow! Every business and livelihood would be affected? Brewton-Parker enrolls less than 1,000 students. It’s not the KIA Plant in West Point! Furthermore, positive economic impact is not a good reason to support an evil institution. Doing so puts money above God.
(3) BPC has literally changed communities and regions all over the globe for the past century.
Here’s an experiment for you when you go to church next Sunday. Ask people if they’ve ever heard of this world-changing “icon.” Most Georgia Baptist I’ve talked to don’t even know it exists, yet they continue to give wasted tithes and offerings to support it.
Should We Pray For Brewton Parker?
I don’t think, for one second, that God is with Brewton-Parker College or the Georgia Baptist Convention. Just because a place or organization is “Baptist” in name, doesn’t it make it a God-ordained holy cause. When I examine Brewton-Parker, all the way from the financial scandal to a board of trustees who were obtuse (or crooked) enough to appoint the charlatan Ergun Caner as a school President, I don’t see a God-honoring institution. I see a whitewashed tomb whose iniquity is nearly complete. Let the accreditation removal be the straw that broke the camel’s (that was too big to fit through the needle for being puffed up with pride) back. Good riddance to Brewton-Parker College. I pray that young people will become world changers for Christ despite the machinations of the good ole boys in the Georgia Baptist Convention. I pray that Caner and company will repent and turn away from their wicked ways. Great is the fall of the house whose foundation is built upon the sand.
Fearing God and not Man
Aside from the apathy of every day church-goers, one of the things that disturbs me most about the culture of the Georgia Baptist Convention is the fear of man amongst the pastorate. These stories I’m telling you aren’t secrets. They are well documented. Why aren’t more pastors speaking out? Is it because they are afraid they won’t get invited to the next big preaching conference? Is it because they are afraid they will not considered for the next posh Georgia Baptist post? (Georgia Baptist College presidents, for example, make six-figures to run very small colleges). Are the pastors running the show more concerned with making money and looking out for their friends that looking after their flocks? Pictures speak a thousand words, so I’ll let these pictures do the talking.
Gerald Harris, interviewing Ergun Caner, Harris is the editor of the Christian Index, a Georgia Baptist Convention news service.
Gerald Harris preaches a conference with Don Hattaway
Influential men like Don Hattaway and Ergun Caner seem to be doing just fine no matter what the outcome of their actions and inactions turn out to be, but who’s looking out for the little guy like Matthew LeHew? Matthew LeHew told the truth in a helpful way and now he is afraid of losing his job. Matthew LeHew is an ordained minister with a wife to support. Why should he have to live in a culture of fear to keep his job? It’s just not fitting. It’s wrong. Now, because of the culture of fear and secrecy in the Georgia Baptist Convention, I believe Matthew LeHew has taken the first step (taking down his article) towards living a life of compromise. It’s a step I’ve been tempted to take.
Matthew LeHew with his bride.
I know that people often wonder why I spend so much time on the computer lamenting the problems in my state and national denomination. I’ve three great jobs, a beautiful wife, three lovely children, and seminary classes for which to study. Why do I spend my time doing this? Well, look right there at that picture of Matthew LeHew. That’s a man with smiling bride and handsome dog who set out to do the right thing and was threatened with job loss…from a Christian institution. One day, my little daughters, God willing, are going to be brides just like Matthew’s wife. They’ll have a family to look after and their husband will be responsible for supporting it. I don’t want my daughters and their husbands to feel pressure to compromise God’s will for money…but I know they will feel that pressure. I hope, when they think of their father, they’ll see an example of a man who resisted it. I’ve already had a Baptist leader try to get me in trouble at one of my jobs for speaking out. I’m quite certain that calling out the people whom I’ve called out will limit my options when I graduate seminary. So be it. People might think I have a personal axe to grind with Don Hattaway. I don’t. He’s a nice man and a fine preacher. I sat under his preaching for years and had only two disagreements with his exposition. He thinks there was an eye of the needle gate in Jerusalem. I don’t. He thinks Jephthah’s daughter went to serve as a temple virgin; I think she was sacrificed. Such disagreements don’t even matter! It was during one of his sermons that I got under conviction to obey God in believer’s Baptism. It was under his sermons that I got under the conviction to answer the call to seminary…and it was under conviction that I left his church. Doing what feels right isn’t always easy and sometimes it means calling on nice people to do the right thing. Don Hattaway…do the right thing. Matthew LeHew…do the right thing. Georgia Baptists…do the right thing.
Keep up the Skeer
This isn’t my first article about the Georgia Baptist Convention and its problem of corruption and it likely won’t be my last. I’m staying diligent in my calls for justice, repentance, and accountability. The confederate general, Nathan Bedford Forest, who saved the city of Rome, GA from an attacking Union force led by Colonel Abel Streight had a saying, “Get ’em skeered and keep the skeer on ’em.” That’s what I’m doing. Little by little, I know I’m reaching people. People are seeing something. People are saying something. Soon, people will do something. If the problems upon which I opine are ignored, people will forget about them. I conject that scandals in the church have been swept under the rug for years; high-powered preachers aren’t used to having to answer for gross mismanagement of convention funds. The internet is changing that, for the better, I think. Nathan Bedford Forest was often outmanned and outgunned when he faced an enemy. This was the case when he faced Abel Streight. However, Forest defeated Streight (as he did many others) by outsmarting him. Forest did not play by Streight’s rules. On top of having my job threatened, I’ve had Matthew 18 misapplied to me twice by Georgia Baptist leaders. I’m done playing by their rules. After he accepted Abel Streight’s surrender Nathan Bedford Forest told the agitated colonel, “All’s Fair in Love and War.” Well, Georgia Baptist Convention, I’m done playing by your manmade, legalistic rules of secrecy and fear-mongering. I’m sticking to what the Bible says. The Bible tells me that men like Matthew LeHew should proclaim the truth boldly when they see a wrong that needs to be righted. I know I will. How dare you, Georgia Baptist Convention, make Matthew LeHew feel like his job is in jeopardy while at the same time employing that charlatan Ergun Caner.
Remember, the eye in the sky is watching us all.
*Please note that the preceding is my personal opinion. It is not necessarily the opinion of any entity by which I am employed, any church at which I am a member, any church which I attend, or the educational institution at which I am enrolled. Any copyrighted material displayed or referenced is done under the doctrine of fair use.
[1] Per Matthew LeHew’s article “Ergun Caner is Wrong About Brewton-Parker’s Accreditation” as published at MatthewLeHew.com
[2] ibid
[3] ibid
[4] ibid
[5] ibid
[6] ibid
[7] ibid
[8] ibid
[9] ibid
[10] ibid
[11] ibid
[12] ibud
Seth Dunn 
Good post, Seth. I do have a slight disagreement with one point. I’m not a supporter of the lifestyle statement and I’m secure in my salvation. The problem with the lifestyle statement is that it doesn’t provide any remedy for who determines if the statement has been violated. If employees have to place trust for fair treatment in the hands of someone like Don Dowless, then anyone who signs that is a fool. In an ironic way, Mr. LeHew could be found guilty of violating the very statement that you and other Baptists agree with. “I will be loyal to the mission of Shorter University as a Christ-centered institution affiliated with the Georgia Baptist Convention.” Dr. Dowless and the trustees could very easily deem that Mr. LeHew’s original post was in violation of that clause, demand that Mr. LeHew remove it and threaten his job in response to the post. That’s my main issue with the statement in connection with one’s employment at Shorter. Is there any means for due process for employees? Who determines what “reject as acceptable” even means? The statement reminds me somewhat of the “Anti-Blogging Resolution” adopted by the GBC a few years ago. Surely nobody would advocate for someone to “sow discord among the brethren”, so all believers should be supportive of the resolution. However, in practice all that resolution does is provide leadership a way to suppress legitimate criticism. It also never occurs to the GBC leaders that much of what Gerald Harris writes would be in violation of that very resolution, but since it is criticism that they agree with it’s all acceptable. The GBC leadership has become the Boston Red Sox of state conventions. They’ll steal bases late in the game ahead by a large margin, silliness is just ‘Manny being Manny’ and David ‘Big Pappi’ Ortiz has earned the right to admire his home runs. But if a team does that against them, there will be a benches clearing brawl because that team isn’t ‘respecting the game’.
Thanks, Dave.
Reading my own words, I realize that I didn’t state one of my points very well. I’m not saying that anyone who doesn’t think the lifestyle statement is a good idea is lost. I mean to communicate that lostness is communicated by one’s denial of basic biblical moral tenets (such as the sinfulness of homosexual acts and the idea that one who engages in such acts is not fit to serve as a Christian leader) and one’s actions in taking to the streets to make this denial in a public side-of-the-road protest.
Seth:
You said:”I Googled them and searched for them on Facebook. My purpose in doing so was to contact them and witness to them. ”
IMO that was mighty arrogant of you! Are people not allowed to follow their conscience without being deemed to be lost by folks like yourself.
Tom, I think I can understand what led you to that conclusion (that I’m arrogant). I do hope however, that you can appreciate that I meant well in my actions. If I think that people people are (or probably are) lost for any given reason, I think I have a moral responsibility to witness to them. If that makes me arrogant, well okay. I’ll suffer that label if it’s the result of being a witness for Christ.
Further, I think it’s very interesting that you singled out this, rather obscure, section of my article for a specific criticism. The little side story of my witnessing to [named redacted] and company is Tangential to LeHew’s criticism or the incompetence of the GBC leadership. So why’s it here?
The purpose of this side story is to establish my character to the reader. I’m a Southern Baptist fundamentalist who thinks it’s important to preach the good news to lost people…and I actually do it. I once asked Don Hattaway (this was one Facebook), after he posted a concerning article about a decline in baptisms and church attendance, what he and others in leadership intended to do about the problem. His friend, Pastor Mike Stone (who is active in the GBC), almost immediately asked me how many people I’d baptized and discipled lately (basically saying, “Hey, what have you done, Mr. Layperson?). Showing that I do care about witnessing to other gives me credibility with the crowd who is invested in Shorter.
Many critics of Caner are dismissed as Calvinist detractors or some other type of disaffected malcontent. I want to make sure that I come across as a “baptist descended from baptists, as it were. Caner detractors often get written off as “radical Calvinists” or (around Northwest Georgia) “Yankee” Calvinists. Well, I witness to lost people who are total strangers and know General Forest History. I’m no radical Yankee Calvinist. (ironically, Forest was a member of a Calvinist denomination).
I’m not saying people are right to criticize “radical” Calvinists or that they know their church history when then do. I’m just showing that I’m not one.
Lamprecht, Hall, and White are staunch Calvinists. Sometimes, sadly, their input gets discounted just because of this doctrinal difference. Mine can’t be discounted for this reason.
Seth:
Thanks for posting my comment. I do think it is a shame what happened to Matthew. He posted the truth and then was made to take it down.
I am a graduate of Shorter College. I follow the ongoing saga on “the hill”. While I appreciate many points of your article, Shorter is in trouble under the current crowd of leaders. Incoming freshmen numbers for the fall semester appears to be SHOCKINGLY low. They seem to be hitching their plow to the athletic department instead of an academic one, in the long run this will prove to be the wrong mule. The lifestyle statement served as a tool to clear out those that would not welcome the new regime with open arms. I do not see Dowless as a long-term president of the institution. He is the dirty work figurehead. I live in Cartersville and respect trustee people who live here, but most seem to have no clue that trustees are to look out for the welfare of the school, not just believe whatever they are told by Dowless and those above him. Of course, any dissent would be met with an iron fist. (Forgive any misspellings, I am typing on a phone). Kind regards, Alan
Replying on my phone Alan,
Do you know the names of the local trustees? I can’t find the names published anywhere on the Shorter site. I’d like to contact them and give them my perspective of the LeHew story, one they might not get from Dowless and Don Hattaway.
Surely the leadership at Shorter isn’t planning on creating an athletic powerhouse. Maybe they are just trying to set up to provide off season revenue through sports camps. I don’t know. To be forthright, I don’t forsee any Georgia Baptist College becoming an academic power house. That is unfortunate.
I hope people will take a lesson from the Brewton-Parker baseball national championship and the federal aid money that may have paid for it.
Hi Seth,
I am just catching up on your writings regarding Shorter. I am an alumna and former faculty member. I signed the Lifestyle Documents – against my gut instinct… even as a born again believer, I knew this document was an afront to so many of my respected colleauges (also born again Christian, even Baptist) whose well-deserved, hard-earned tenure was completely meaningless unless they – under the iron fist – signed these documents. Many of my colleagues actually disagreed but had no choice but to “toe the line” and sign. I watched as new faculty signed and then said “hey… have you seen the job market out there???” I sat on search committees and watched as underqualifed, inexperienced people were hired to fill the shoes of giants in our regional and even national academe. Their Faith Statements were prioirty one, CVs priority two.
One day, someone will write about that tumultuous year at Shorter and how music and theatre programs suffered most. My own program went from 35 students to a remaining 4. Most of those students went to better programs across the country who now know just what Shorter has become. A lot of those students, by the way, were so devastated and their education was so disrupted, they have sworn off all things Baptist. I am talking about preacher’s kids… This was not due to documents and core values but to the callous, controlling attitude of the administration who had been told boldfaced lies about our students and faculty. The entire year that I stayed was miserable. Everyone always looking over their shoulders and whispering in shadows for fear of falling short and losing their jobs at the president’s whim. I received a “warning” from my supervisor when I publicly questioned on the Facebook alumni site why the Alumni Governing Board had chosen a non-alum to speak and sign books. I had been asked – on the same site – how I would feel about them hiring a band, to which I replied “I want to hear fellow alumni performers. We have plenty.” When I did not attend the Homecoming celebrations (because my husband was working and both children had the croup), i received an email from the new VP of Advancement asking why I had “chosen not to participate, especially when faculty were guests.” Also, when I took concerns about our theatre director cutting/pasting/censoring/rewriting a Federally Copywritten, contemporary published play, my emails were deemed “disrespectful.” I have kept all of this correspondence and often go back and read it just to remind myself how NOT “Christ-like” the admnistraton treated its faculty. As a matter of tranparency, my contract was not renewed. I spent that last year pregnant, scrutinized and bewildered at what was happening in my job and to my beloved Alma Mater. We have all marveled at the debate among Christians and Baptists, knowing and watching the true issues of power and control, wondering to what end these means will come. Personally, I feel so bad for Matthew and cannot imagine the fear he is feeling. I promise, though, on that beautiful campus that used to be a Camelot for so many, he is not alone.
Seth – you did not ask for, nor receive permission to publicly post a private conversation between the two of us. Kindly take any references to me out of your article so we can avoid the need for a cease and desist letter. I do not know what your goals are in all of this but I want no part of it. You can also kindly keep your assumptions about me and my beliefs to yourself.
I expect your response back to me to be a confirmation that you have edited my name out of your blog.
Seth – Names of all trustees are a closely guarded secret and have been since Dowless’ second year at Shorter. Very few people, faculty, staff, and even some administrators, know who these people are. There’s a reason for this. The Shorter powers-that-be don’t want the trustees to hear anything other than what Don Dowless and company want them to hear. End of story.
Tight control is what regimes initiated via coup do. I am a SC grad of 1976 and trustee 2001-2005 during the GBC theft of the school. It was a well-documented conspiracy between Dr R White and Dr N Price. I was actively involved in the SC defense of the school from the GBC thieves. The last open administration was that of President Ed Schrader, a man of true integrity and great vision.
When it comes to accreditation, representatives of institutions, even those not involved, do need to exercise discretion. Such can place your own institution at risk. While I agree that Caner is understating the gravity of the situation, the information available to the public is not complete. I’m involved in accreditation (I’m a full-time professor who works very closely with our Institutional Effectiveness VP on accreditation issues) as well and would not make a public statement about a school on probation or in danger of losing their accreditation.
Let me start by saying I’m not a supporter of Caner as things stand now. I had classes with him at his first professorial appointment and was irked by his lack of content. I was and am reformed in my soteriology, but he and I were friendly. I did notice some inconsistencies in his testimony but didn’t think much of it until the events of the last few years.
First, accreditation is not a measure of the “realness” or rigor of a school. Thats demonstrated by the faculty (teaching and publishing) and the graduates. It is the faculty that IS the college. It allows a school to gain access to financial aid and shows an external form of quality control. Accreditation is a measure of a school’s ability to meet and advance their mission. Faculty credentials, academic rigor, and curriculum issues are just 3 of the 22 areas that the accrediting body we are affiliated with gauges us by.
In all likelihood, there are a number of options being pursued. Regional accrediting bodies (which are private bodies run by academics and recognized by the bureaucrats at USDE and the academics at CHEA) are only one form of accreditation. It’s considered the gold standard as their accreditation is broad based and not specific to a type of school (Bible Colleges fit into the latter, for example). However, there are plentiful national and programmatic accrediting bodies recognized by both the USDE and CHEA which will keep accredited status. ABHE (Association for Biblical Higher Education) is one of the oldest accrediting bodies and accredits many highly respected Christian institutions of higher education that are broadly evangelical. As the same sex marriage issue becomes more of a problem for evangelical institutions, ABHE will likely be pursued by more Christian schools.
I can see the school, if it loses its appeal, suing SACS in court (which has been happening a lot lately) while it affiliates, applies, and candidates with a group like ABHE or TRACCS (Trans-National Association of Christian Colleges and Schools). The only problem is that ABHE is just as difficult as SACS (who is the accreditation trend-setter for everyone). So much so that they frequently do joint site visits and share reports on jointly accredited schools during reaffirmation (Moody is an example of one accredited by both ABHE and a regional body).
While TRACCS is a USDE and CHEA recognized accrediting body, credits from TRACCS schools are not readily accepted as TRACS was started by folks from the ICR (Institution for Creation Research) to accredit the ICR. As a result, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, to this day, does not recognize TRACCS (if only accredited by TRACCS) accreditation for degree granting institutions that offer degrees of a non-religious relevance (they can’t legally operate in Texas outside of religious relevance).
A bigger issue facing schools like Brewton-Parker and many other Christian schools is the heavy handed role the president plays. I see this in how Brewton-Parker is operating. They follow the strong senior pastor model of many baptist churches. However, in reality, accrediting bodies look for faculty governance. Typically, any policy or directional change that affects the entire institution needs not only faculty approval but also faculty origination. That is, for example at our school, the three faculty standing committees (Student Development, Curriculum, Faculty Development) are the originating group of policy in those areas. Faculty votes on the recommendations and the president presents them to the board. At least, that’s what we’re coaxing the board towards. The board of directors (trustees) have the final say. Christian schools have gotten very good at hiding the fact that most of their initiatives all come from the president’s office. I’ve found a few schools, that are thoroughly conservative, in which the opposite is true. Moody, DTS, and Gordon College (along with Gordon-Conwell) are all schools in which the faculty have a real and rich level of institutional governance. The president of those schools does what he’s supposed to do: preside over the administrative areas of the school to implement the wishes of the faculty and the board AND be a figurehead for donors (he raises a lot of money).
Unfortunately, the department of education is throwing bureaucratic requirement on top of bureaucratic requirement for accrediting bodies to hold their member schools accountable to. This is a real strain on the faculty AND budget. What is happening with Brewton-Parker is a very complex issue.
Pingback: Fahrenheit Highway 411: Matthew LeHew, Shorter University, and Ergun Caner